Figma’s AI design feature disabled after copying Apple’s weather app

Published on:

Figma CEO Dylan Subject introduced that his firm would quickly disable its new “Make Design” AI function.

The choice comes after allegations that the instrument was reproducing designs strikingly just like Apple’s Climate app, elevating issues about whether or not Figma’s coaching information accommodates copyrighted content material.

If Figma’s instruments comprise copyright materials, then so will its outputs. That would go away customers susceptible to authorized points. 

- Advertisement -

Figma is a collaborative internet design app which not too long ago rolled out AI-powered“Make Design” options at its latest Config convention. It embeds a number of off-the-shelf AI fashions into Figma’s personal techniques, providing:

  1. AI-generated content material: Produces related textual content content material immediately in design mockups.
  2. AI-powered rewriting and translation: Adjusts copy size, tone, and language inside designs.
  3. FigJam AI: Helps visualize advanced concepts, kind suggestions, and automate tedious duties.

The Apple climate app controversy surrounding Figma’s AI options started when Andy Allen, founding father of NotBoring Software program, found that Figma’s AI instrument constantly generated designs harking back to Apple’s Climate app. 

Is Allen proper? Have a look beneath and see for your self.

Allen took to X to accuse Figma of “closely” coaching its instrument on present apps.

- Advertisement -

Whereas Subject took accountability for the oversight, he additionally said that the problem in all probability outcomes from the app’s off-the-shelf fashions — in different phrases, it’s not Figma’s fault. Subject mentioned, “In different phrases, the accusations round information coaching on this tweet are false.”

See also  Can AI Write a More Convincing Phishing Email Than Humans?

Truthful sufficient, however what occurred to due diligence? Is Figma not advertising and marketing this instrument based mostly on its new AI options, thus taking over some accountability for its outputs?

Subject then mentioned he’d take away the function to analyze, “I’ve requested our workforce to quickly disable the Make Design function till we’re assured we are able to stand behind its output. The function will likely be disabled when our US based mostly workforce wakes up in just a few hours, and we’ll re-enable it when we now have accomplished a full QA go on the underlying design system.”

Figma’s AI design instruments have already attracted mass criticism. Do they decrease the barrier to internet design and democratize expertise, or threat the mass manufacturing of poor-quality, cookie-cutter apps?

The jury is out.

This has additionally tapped into the broader raging debate about copyright and mental property within the AI period. 

See also  Sam Altman says international agency should monitor AI models

Final 12 months, a significant research by cognitive scientist Dr. Gary Marcus and idea artist Reid Southen, titled “Generative AI Has a Visible Plagiarism Downside,” uncovered the power of AI fashions like Midjourney and DALL-E 3 to provide photos that carefully resemble copyrighted materials – just like Figma’s instrument.

- Advertisement -

Authorized challenges are additionally mounting, with authors and media corporations submitting lawsuits towards AI corporations for allegedly utilizing copyrighted materials of their coaching information with out permission. 

These are but to be resolved, leaving everybody, from AI builders to creators, scratching their heads over what copyright means immediately.

- Advertisment -


- Advertisment -

Leave a Reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here